Shark Wandvac Review

The Wandvac finished at the back of our test group. While it does clean difficult-to-access areas and picks up pet hair a bit better than some, it simply costs too much for us to be able to recommend.

Dust & Dirt

The Wandvac took a bit longer than average to clean up flour from a plastic sheet in our dusting test, hampered by its small brush. This brush also leaves streaks while dusting, requiring multiple passes over this area.

The soft bristles on this brush struggled to clean dirt or dried mud, with this vacuum doing one of the worst jobs at cleaning mud from linoleum in our test. However, the soft bristles allow you to easily clean corners or on small ledges.

Tough Messes

This vacuum could suck up Mini-Wheats cereal without any tools attached, which is about the biggest particle type it can handle, but that's average for this vacuum category.

The Wandvac performed slightly above average when we challenged it to remove flour from a low-pile automotive-style carpet section. It vacuumed a decent amount of flour with either the bristle or crevice attachment, but it left leftover remnants in the fibers unless we scrubbed with the bristle brush and did a ton of passes.

It struggled a bit more to remove crushed oats from the same type of carpet or a couch cushion. The Wandvac kept sucking down to the couch cushion and left plenty of oat fragments and dust behind. It also left plenty of oats behind on the carpet, even flinging some to the side while cleaning, creating a bigger mess.

The Wandvac registered an airspeed of approximately 827 feet per minute (fpm), which is significantly lower than the group's average measurement of 1300 fpm.

Hard-to-Reach Areas

The Wandvac did a little better in this metric, based on how well it cleaned out a sliding window track and on how far it could reach into a 1.25" and 3" gap — similar to what you would encounter cleaning under a piece of furniture or between the seat of your car and the center console.

The Wandvac is great for cleaning loose debris out of the narrow slot of a sliding window, quickly and easily sucking up all of the oats. It also has a decent reach, cleaning 13" into a 3" tall slot, which is quite far for these products, and 4" into a 1.25" space.

Battery Life

Unfortunately, the Wandvac didn't impress us in this metric. It didn't even last for 10 minutes, dying after 9 minutes and 45 seconds. However, it does recharge quite fast, only taking 2.5 hours.

Convenience

The Wandvac earned a mediocre score, despite earning some points for being lightweight, weighing about half as much as most other products.

Surprisingly, this device isn't that much quieter than some of the other larger products in the competition, and it has a higher-pitched whine that can be irritating. The different tools also aren't integrated, so you must exercise caution not to lose them. The dust bin is straightforward to empty, popping open as soon as you hit the switch. We consider this a positive, but the dust bin's extremely tiny size was a disappointment, so get ready to empty it often.

Pet Hair

The Wandvac vacuumed 99% of the hair from the cushion using its upholstery brush — we found this to be far more effective than its standard brush — and the vast majority of it made it into the collection bin without becoming tangled up on the brush head. It did almost as well on the carpet, but it left behind a bit more, and a decent amount remained trapped on the brush head rather than making it into the collection bin.

Should You Buy the Shark Wandvac?

It's tough for us to recommend the Shark Wandvac when almost every other product is far cheaper and performs better. Based on our testing, we can say this option pairs poor performance with a very high price tag. With higher-scoring contenders in our vacuum review, we think it's worth considering a different device for your cleaning needs.

What Other Handheld Vacuums Should You Consider?