Bissell AirRam Review
Our Verdict
Compare to Similar Products
This Product Bissell AirRam | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Awards | Best Budget Stick Vacuum | ||||
Price | $268 List $265.00 at Amazon | $170 List $154.99 at Amazon | $150 List $91.72 at Amazon | $34 List $33.00 at Amazon | $35 List $34.99 at Amazon |
Overall Score | |||||
Star Rating | |||||
Bottom Line | This cordless stick vacuum scored quite well in our tests, but doesn't quite have the performance or value to win an award | This inexpensive vacuum is convenient and well-priced but only average overall | The advantages of this vacuum are numerous, but the drawbacks of subpar cleaning performance on typical surfaces outweigh those benefits | A budget vacuum with distinct limitations across all metrics | This vacuum definitely wasn't our favorite, with its main merit being its exceptionally low price and not much else |
Rating Categories | Bissell AirRam | Eureka RapidClean Pro | Black+Decker Powers... | Bissell Featherweight | Dirt Devil Simpli-Stik |
Convenience (35%) | |||||
Hard Surface Cleaning (30%) | |||||
Ease of Use (20%) | |||||
Carpet Cleaning (15%) | |||||
Specs | Bissell AirRam | Eureka RapidClean Pro | Black+Decker Powers... | Bissell Featherweight | Dirt Devil Simpli-Stik |
Weight | 8.1 lbs | 5.1 lbs | 5.8 lbs | 2.9 lbs | 3.4 lbs |
Cordless Battery Life | 34 min 52 sec | 23 min 12 sec | Boost: 16 min 36 sec Auto: 24 min 50 sec |
n/a | n/a |
Measured Charge Time | 3 hours 20 min | 4 hours 30 min | 4 hours 45 min | n/a | n/a |
Noise Level | 74 dBa | 65 dBa | 80 dBa | 78 dBa | 74 dBa |
Model Number | 1984 | NEC180 | BHFEA520J | 2033 | SD20000RED |
Measured Head Width | 10.75" | 9.75" | 9.88" | 8" | 9" |
Variable Suction Control | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
Brush On/Off Switch? | No | No | No | Yes | n/a |
Storage | Stands up; retractable handle | Wall mount only | Stands up; wall mount | Stands up | Stands up; falls over easily |
Swivel Head? | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No |
Soft Bumper? | No | Yes | No | No | No |
Cordless? | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No |
Maximum Corded Reach | n/a | n/a | n/a | 15 ft | 17.5 ft |
Our Analysis and Test Results
The Bissell AirRam is good but not great, and its price point is inching toward too high for the performance level. It would be a great vacuum if its price were reduced to compete with other budget-minded models, but there are definitely better top-ranked stick vacuum alternatives on the market for now.
Performance Comparison
Convenience
The entire point of a stick vacuum is to provide a more convenient option than vacuum cleaners with a more traditional design. Because of this, our convenience metric accounts for the largest portion of the overall score at 35%. We based the score for each product on how well it could clean other parts of the home besides the floor, how much it weighed, whether or not it was corded or cordless — and correspondingly, its maximum reach or battery life — and how convenient it is to store each vacuum. The AirRam gave a solid showing in this category.
The AirRam is restricted to vacuuming floors, hurting its score slightly. While other models can transform into a handheld vacuum, this one lacks any transformative abilities. It is also a little on the heavier side, costing it a few more additional points. However, it is stable enough to stand on its own, and the handle retracts to make it even more convenient to store.
This cordless stick vacuum distinguished itself by having an exceptional battery life, lasting for a total of 35 minutes before calling it quits in our tests. It also charges relatively quickly, only taking about 3 hours and 20 minutes to top off the battery completely. These stats are among the best in our entire lineup.
Hard Surface Cleaning
Next, we assessed how well the AirRam cleaned hard flooring. To do this, we spread out rice, flour, cereal, oatmeal, and pet hair on a section of laminate wood floor, then evaluated how well everything was picked up. The AirRam started with a rather unimpressive performance in our rice test, flinging a non-trivial amount of rice about the room as it cleaned. However, it did a much better job at collecting flour, only taking two passes to get all of the flour — even stuff between the cracks in the boards, an area that many vacuums miss. The strong performance continued in our pet hair and cereal collection challenges, with the AirRam sucking up all of the debris without any sign of a struggle. This metric finished out with a solid performance at collecting oats, though some inadvertently got flung across the room.
Ease of Use
This metric, worth 20% of the total score, ranked each vacuum on how easy it is to use, focusing on its noise level and cleaning options and how well each product cleaned close to the edges of a room and under furniture. The AirRam scored very well here.
This vacuum did an average job cleaning along the wall, leaving some debris along the edge and in front of the vacuum.
The AirRam also did exceptionally well at cleaning under furniture, satisfactorily cleaning under our simulated sofa in its entirety, reaching over 37 inches. Very impressive.
This vacuum has swivel steering, though it isn't the most agile when it comes to maneuvering. Additionally, it only has a single cleaning mode, with no option to adjust it for different floor types.
Carpet Cleaning
Accounting for the remaining 15% of the total score, this metric assessed each vacuum at how well it could keep soft floors sparkling. We again used rice, oats, flour, cereal, and pet hair, this time testing on both low-pile flat carpet and medium-pile fluffy carpet.
The AirRam had a similar problem to the hard floor metric when collecting rice from a flat carpet, flinging some of it around. However, it did much better on fluffier carpet, collecting all of the rice without issue.
The AirRam didn't particularly impress us at collecting flour, leaving behind a decent amount. However, it redeemed itself by doing an excellent job at collecting Cheerios, requiring minimal effort on both flat and fluffy carpets, with no noticeable residue. It sucked up oats quite well also, only launching a few flakes across the room. However, this vacuum delivered a poor performance at picking up pet hair, leaving tons behind on the carpet. This performance will undoubtedly be a deal-breaker if you have pets, and you should probably consider an alternative product.
Should You Buy the AirRam?
Possibly. This vacuum offers solid performance in most metrics but is somewhat pricey for what you get. We suspect if you can find it on sale, it could be a good choice. However, with the premium price, we think there are better-performing options in this review. Depending on your goals, we can see this vacuum being a potential option if the price is right.
What Other Stick Vacuum Should You Consider?
Most of the competition is either far more expensive than this vacuum or significantly cheaper. This puts it in a weird position if you are primarily driven by budget. If your budget is small, we like the Eureka RapidClean. We like the Shark Rocket Pet Pro if budget is less of a concern. This vacuum earned one of the highest overall scores n the group, with a high for convenience and better than average cleaning prowess for both flat and carpeted surfaces.