Reviews You Can Rely On

Anycubic Mega S Review

While this printer is a decent budget option, it somewhat failed to stand out from the rest of the pack
gearlab tested logo
Anycubic Mega S Review
Price:  $279 List
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Manufacturer:   Anycubic
David Wise
By David Wise ⋅ Senior Review Editor  ⋅  June 24, 2021
Contributions From: Austin Palmer
56
OVERALL
SCORE
  • Print Quality - 40% 5.0
  • Ease of Use - 30% 6.0
  • Print Capabilities - 20% 7.0
  • Support - 10% 4.0

Our Verdict

We found the Anycubic Mega S to be a fairly run-of-the-mill filament-based 3D printer, but it is relatively budget-friendly. This printer gave about average results in our print quality metric and is decently easy to use. It has a solid set of capabilities but we did find the customer support for this printer to be almost nonexistent in our experience.
REASONS TO BUY
Inexpensive
Decently capable
REASONS TO AVOID
Interface can be finicky
Limited customer support in our experience

Our Analysis and Test Results

This mid-range printer is compact, with the power supply and control box integrated underneath the moving bed. Many other budget printers have the power and control as a separate unit, taking up considerably more of your precious workbench real estate than the Mega S.

anycubic mega s - we found the mega s struggled to stand out from the rest of the pack.
We found the Mega S struggled to stand out from the rest of the pack.
Credit: Jason Peters

Print Quality


The Mega S delivered middling prints, not great, but not bad. We began printing a 3D benchy. The Mega S did decently well, delivering average prints in both PLA and ABS, with only a small amount of drooping on overhangs. The text on the bottom of the PLA version was legible, but the hull had a rough finish with some weird indentations. The text on the ABS version was essentially unreadable.

anycubic mega s - the bridging test.
The bridging test.
Credit: Jason Peters

Next, we looked at how each printer handled bridges (unsupported features) and small details, with our bridging and Eiffel Tower tests. The Mega S struggled with these two prints, with both ABS versions failing completely. The PLA version of the Eiffel Tower did finish printing, but it looked horrible, and it would take a stretch of the imagination to call it a successful print. The PLA bridging test had some noticeable sagging on the longer bridges and an overall lackluster print quality.

The performance of the Mega S did improve a bit with these three prints, delivering acceptable result with a print-in-place articulated elephant and the overhanging geometry. The PLA and ABS elephants both articulated freely, but the print quality is overall a bit rough, with plenty of deformities and defects. It was a similar story with the overhangs, with all but the steepest overhangs actually printing well but the overall quality just seemed to be lacking compared to the top-tier printers.

anycubic mega s - the overhang test.
The overhang test.
Credit: Jason Peters

Dimensional accuracy is based on a nickel test, where a nickel should fit perfectly in the cavity of the print when completed. Unfortunately, both of the openings were a little on the larger side, with plenty of gaps around the coin.

The Anycubic Mega S struggled with the next model, a single-piece articulated platform jack. This printer failed with both the PLA and ABS versions. The ABS wouldn't print successfully and the PLA version repeatedly broke whenever we tried to actuate it. Performance was a bit better with our wireframe cube, showing minimal sagging and only a few strings on both PLA and ABS prints.

anycubic mega s - the low-poly figures.
The low-poly figures.
Credit: Jason Peters

This printer continued to do well with a pair of low-poly figures, producing relatively clean surfaces and smooth overhangs, though the ABS version of the smaller model had a rough surface finish. It also did well with the single-shell spiral vase in both types of plastic, though it had a less-than-amazing surface finish.

We had to resort to using pliers and other tools to remove the temporary supports used in large overhangs. However, the underside of the supported area actually came out pretty clean.

anycubic mega s - this printer is about average when it comes to capabilities.
This printer is about average when it comes to capabilities.
Credit: Jason Peters

Ease of Use


We found it relatively easy to change the filament in the Anycubic Mega S, thanks to its semi-automatic process, though the loading and unloading part can be a bit time-consuming with the slow feed rate. It doesn't have an automatic bed leveler, so you'll have to tinker with 4 independent adjustment screws in each corner of the build plate.

This printer comes mostly assembled, with just a few cables to plug in and other components to attach. You can send files to this printer via USB or SD card, and there is a display on this printer that shows the percentage completed and the time elapsed while the printer is going.

anycubic mega s - the threaded jars came out alright.
The threaded jars came out alright.
Credit: Jason Peters

Print Capabilities


This printer's maximum hotend temperature is 260°C, and its peak heated bed temperature is 120°C, giving it a decently wide range of compatible printing materials. It isn't constrained to proprietary products, so any 1.75mm filament that will work with those temperatures is fine to use with the Mega S.

It has a slightly smaller-than-average build volume of 210mm x 210mm x 205mm and a build plate that provides plenty of adhesions. We used the free Cura slicing program for our tests, but you can use a variety of other software suites, both free and paid.

anycubic mega s - we weren't too impressed with the customer support from anycubic.
We weren't too impressed with the customer support from Anycubic.
Credit: Jason Peters

Support


Our last metric looked at the customer support and, regrettably, Anycubic hasn't delivered the best results. There are only a few troubleshooting videos on the website, and we only found a contact form that didn't yield the best results for us when it came to technical questions.

Value


All in all, the Mega S is a decent value, delivering good quality prints at a fairly affordable price if you don't mind dealing with any troubleshooting issues yourself.

Conclusion


While Mega S is definitely far from our favorite or the best printer we have seen, it is a decent machine with one of the lower price tags of the group. It might be a great starter printer for someone looking for a project and who doesn't mind dealing with any troubleshooting issues on their own. However, it probably isn't the best printer for someone who doesn't want to spend time tuning or tweaking their machine to maximize performance.

David Wise and Austin Palmer