Reviews You Can Rely On

Brita Metro Review

A convenient, space-saving pitcher that's great for individuals or small households, but its filtration falls short on health-related contaminants
gearlab tested logo
Brita Metro Review
Credit: Matt Lighthart
Price:  $26 List
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Manufacturer:   Brita
Sam Hill
By Sam Hill ⋅ Review Editor  ⋅  December 5, 2025
66
OVERALL
SCORE


RANKED
#10 of 13
  • Critical Contaminant Removal - 35% 5.5
  • Other Contaminant Removal - 25% 7.1
  • Taste - 20% 6.6
  • Maintenance and Setup - 10% 8.5
  • Operating Cost - 10% 7.6

Our Verdict

The Brita Standard Pitcher Filter offers an easy, affordable way to improve the taste and clarity of tap water. It is well-suited for individuals or small households that already have access to a generally safe water supply. It's compact, simple to maintain, and features a smart filter alert for convenient upkeep. While it performs respectably in reducing chlorine and certain metals, it falls short in removing more complex contaminants like PFAS or nitrates. Users looking for a low-cost, low-maintenance filter that improves flavor and peace of mind will find it appealing, but those with older plumbing or high-risk water sources should consider a higher-grade system.
REASONS TO BUY
Smart filter alert
Easy to fill
Slim and compact design
REASONS TO AVOID
Exposed spout may absorb fridge odors
Removes fewer contaminants
Limited PFNA reduction
Added trace aluminum in testing
Poor performance with acidic compounds

Our Analysis and Test Results

This compact pitcher is a simple kitchen addition to get fresher-tasting and clearer water. The fast-flowing filter keeps cup or water bottle fill-ups quick, and users report its six-cup capacity is decent for small households. We tested this model with Standard Brita filters, but you can also snag the Elite filters for less-frequent replacements and a slightly better contaminant removal performance.

The main drawbacks to this pitcher are that the capacity is a little low for bigger families, and its contaminant removal during testing was only average — it did well removing heavy metals and trace elements, but struggled with more critical contaminants like lead.

Credit: Matt Lighthart

Critical Contaminant Removal


The filter does a decent job with everyday city water, reducing chlorine, lead, and uranium to safer levels — but not levels that our testers were impressed with. Only 50.78% of PFNA was removed from our contaminated solutions, so it's not a go-to for more serious contamination. This is really only a pick for light filtering of drinking water that's already decent quality.

brita metro
Credit: Matt Lighthart

Heavy Metal and Trace Element Removal


Generally, this filter performed well for its price point, particularly in terms of secondary contaminants. Most metals and trace elements were lowered to comfortable levels, though aluminum still showed up in some tests. Overall, it's reliable for everyday drinking water.

We did notice some differences in testing results between Brita pitchers using the same standard filter. The Brita Metro wasn't able to eliminate the trace amounts of Chromium that were present in our sample water — this is rarely a concern in municipal supplies, but it is a confusing data point worth considering.

Credit: Matt Lighthart

Taste


Taste is the metric that the average user talks about the most with this pitcher. Users report crisp, fresh water with little to no chlorine flavor. Some note a slight charcoal or flat aftertaste initially, but it fades after a few uses. Out of 828 reviews on Amazon that mention water taste, 738 were positive, highlighting a noticeable improvement over unfiltered tap water. In our opinion, this is the main reason to buy this filter, as it isn't as effective at contaminant removal as some others.

brita metro
Credit: Matt Lighthart

Maintenance and Setup


Setup is simple: rinse the filter, fill, and go. Standard Brita Filters last around 40 gallons. For an average two-person household, we estimate this to be around 2 months. If you prefer to deal with fewer filter changes, you can opt for the brand's Elite filters which last 120 gallons according to Brita. In both cases, replacing the filters is a simple task. Just keep the filter wet between uses to avoid drying out. This pitcher is low-effort and straightforward for everyday use.

brita metro
Credit: Matt Lighthart

Operating Cost


Replacement filters are inexpensive, ranging from $8 for a single pack to $30 for a six-pack. While filters need to be swapped fairly often, the total yearly cost remains low, making it one of the more budget-friendly options for small households. As long as you aren't running through filters in a larger household (which this pitcher wouldn't be a great option for anyway, considering its size), our tester estimated the five-year cost of this pitcher to be around $176.

brita metro
Credit: Matt Lighthart

Should You Buy the Brita Metro?


The Brita Standard Pitcher is a solid choice for individuals or small households who want better-tasting, cleaner water without fuss or high cost. It works well for city or well water that is already generally safe and is easy to maintain with inexpensive filters. However, it's not the best option for anyone dealing with high-risk water, heavy contamination, or specific health concerns, such as PFAS or extreme nitrate levels.

brita metro
Credit: Matt Lighthart

What Other Water Filters Should You Consider?


Pitcher-style filters are very convenient, and if you'd like to stick with this, but want better filtration abilities, we recommend the Pur Plus 11-Cup Pitcher. It has top-tier scores when it comes to contaminant removal, and it will cost you a bit less overall.

brita metro
Credit: Matt Lighthart

And if you aren't really worried about contaminants, but have a larger household, check out the Brita Large 10-Cup Pitcher — it had nearly identical test scores from our lab but has a higher capacity for less frequent refills.

Side-by-Side Comparison
Compare Brita Metro versus top competing products:
Or, compare up to 5 products side-by-side here.
Sam Hill