Reviews You Can Rely On

Brita Metro Review

A cheap, mini-size pitcher for improved taste, but misses the mark with health-related contaminants
gearlab tested logo
Brita Metro Review (The Brita Metro (6-cup) is basically a shrunken version of the Brita Large (10 cup).)
The Brita Metro (6-cup) is basically a shrunken version of the Brita Large (10 cup).
Credit: Matt Lighthart
Price:  $26 List
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Manufacturer:   Brita
Austin Palmer
By Austin Palmer ⋅ Senior Review Analyst  ⋅  July 15, 2026
Contributions From: Lissette Velasquez
44
OVERALL
SCORE


RANKED
#13 of 13
  • Lead & Metals - 25% 5.7
  • Forever Chemicals (PFAS) - 20% 2.0
  • Microplastics - 15% 3.0
  • Fluoride & Nitrates - 15% 3.3
  • Taste & Chlorine - 15% 6.6
  • Daily Use & Upkeep Cost - 10% 5.9
List Price: $26

Our Verdict

The budget-friendly Brita Metro with Original filter will improve the flavor of your water and remove some heavy metals, but that's about it. In our tests, it completely removed the chlorinated taste from our tap and captured over 90% of lead. It's a solid start, but not enough for total peace of mind in risky conditions. It also failed to capture forever PFAS chemicals and microplastics, contaminants other budget pitchers could handle. If your needs are simple, space is limited, and your budget is tight, it'll do the trick. But if safer drinking water is what you're after, there are better options.
REASONS TO BUY
Affordable
Improves taste
Compact size
Filter alert
REASONS TO AVOID
Not great for health concerns
Frequent refills
No spout cover

Our Analysis and Test Results

The Brita Metro is easy to fill and makes water taste better, but beneath the surface, it shows below-average contaminant-removal performance.   Credit: Matt Lighthart

The Brita Metro is a simple, budget-friendly way to get better-tasting water. We love its compact size, which takes up minimal fridge space, and its large fill hole, which makes refills easier. That said, the smaller capacity requires frequent refills, making the Metro best for individuals or small households. And it did little to remove the risky, health-related contaminants we spiked into our water samples.

The EWG's Tap Water Database is a great place to see what may be lurking in your water. Or, if you draw from a well or have concerns about aging pipes, Tap Score can give you a more personalized view.

Lead & Metals


The Metro scored below average in our metals test. It helps some, but we'd still like to see a bit more protection.


Heavy metals are a concern because they can be harmful to your health, even when present at very low levels. The Brita picked up over 90% of heavy metals like lead and uranium, but left others, like arsenic, completely behind.

% Removal of Lead & Other Metals
ProductLeadArsenicUraniumLithium
Best100100100100
Average91.14167.231.8
Brita Metro940960
Worst012310

If you have old pipes and your lead levels are only mildly elevated, the Metro should be adequate to reduce the burden. But for severely elevated levels, like those seen in Flint, Michigan, 94% removal isn't enough to be considered safe.

The Original filters don't offer the best protection against metals, PFAS, and microplastics.   Credit: Matt Lighthart

Forever Chemicals (PFAS)


PFAS are chemicals that build up in our bodies over time and can increase our risk of cancer, disrupt our hormones, or cause reproductive and developmental effects. They're yucky stuff and fairly common in urban areas. Unfortunately, the Brita had one of the worst performances of the group, offering little protection from PFAS.


The Brita Metro reduced PFNA and PFBA (two common PFAS chemicals) by about 50%, which is better than nothing. Still, that may not be enough to bring the levels down to the EPA's “safe” zone.

% PFAS Removal
ProductTotal ReductionPFNA ReductionPFBA Reduction
Best100100100
Average90.28997.8
Brita Metro545172
Worst545172

Microplastics


Just like with PFAS, the Brita Metro provided poor microplastics removal.


Microplastics are everywhere, though we're still not entirely sure how harmful microplastics are to our health. If you like to play things safe, it's best to find a filter that can catch them. The Brita captured very little ultrafine microplastics (less than 5 microns) and even shed some larger microplastics (greater than 15 microns) into our drinking water.

Microplastic Removal By Particle Size
 Brita Metro
15.0+ Microns
15.0 - 5.0 Microns
5.0 - 2.5 Microns
Overall Rating
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

brita metro - given its below-average removal of health-related contaminants, the...
Given its below-average removal of health-related contaminants, the Metro is best for users only looking to improve taste.   Credit: Matt Lighthart

Fluoride & Nitrates


Fluoride, nitrates, and sulfates are tricky contaminants to remove, best tackled by a specialized reverse osmosis system. So, like most pitchers, the Brita Metro scored below average in this metric.


While the Brita made a small dent, it's not adequate to make a meaningful impact. If you live in an agricultural area, drink from a private well, have water that smells like rotten eggs, or just have concerns about fluoridated water, your best bet is to invest in a more robust filtration system.

Fluoride, Nitrates, & Sulfate Removal
ProductFluorideNitrateSulfate
Best100100100
Average30.559.337.2
Brita Metro0616
Worst000

Taste & Chlorine


Most municipalities add chlorine to your tap water to keep it clean and free of microorganisms. Unfortunately, this can also leave your water tasting like a chemically-treated pool.


Like all water filters we tested, the Brita Metro removed 100% of chlorine, making it much more palatable and refreshing. And, about 90% of Amazon reviewers agree that the Brita improves taste. It's not spring water quality, but it's a big step in the right direction.

brita metro - thanks to its small size, the metro can easily fit into the door of...
Thanks to its small size, the Metro can easily fit into the door of most fridges.   Credit: Matt Lighthart

Daily Use & Upkeep Cost


The Brita Metro is pretty darn affordable for singles or couples with low water consumption. And its small 6-cup size is perfect for refrigerators low on space. But it needs to be refilled constantly, which felt like a daily chore. Because of this, it scored slightly below average in daily use & upkeep cost.


The Brita Metro is very easy to set up and requires minimal maintenance, aside from occasional cleaning. After you've filtered about 40 gallons of water, the filter alert will light up, letting you know it's time to change the filter.

brita metro - the metro's nifty sensor monitors tilts and time to accurately...
The Metro's nifty sensor monitors tilts and time to accurately estimate your remaining filter life.   Credit: Matt Lighthart

If you're a single person just using the pitcher for drinking water, you'll need to replace it every few months. But if you're a couple using it for cooking as well, it may need to be replaced every month.

Setup and Maintenance
 Brita Metro
Setup TimeShort
Setup EffortLow
Maintenance EffortLow
Maintenance Frequency40 gallons, approx 2 months
Overall Rating
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Replacements are cheap, especially if you buy in bulk. We estimate that a standard household of two that uses filtered water for cooking and drinking will spend about $60 a year on filters, which is pretty darn good. If you're a larger family, it's more expensive and tedious to keep up.

Estimated Cost Per Year
Product40 gal/month120 gal/month
Best3333
Brita Metro60240
Average84.9237
Worst240960

The Brita Metro filters water faster than most, but we still didn't like having to refill it so often. We wouldn't recommend this to families or users with high water needs.

Time to Filter One Gallon
ProductMinutes
Best1
Brita Metro6
Average13.2
Worst34

brita metro - the metro has a large opening that's easy to fill, but there's no...
The Metro has a large opening that's easy to fill, but there's no spout cover to keep lingering refrigerator “flavors” out of your water.   Credit: Matt Lighthart


Should You Buy the Brita Metro?


The Brita Metro's biggest draw is its low price and compact size, but when equipped with the Original Filter, it struggles with basic contaminant removal. If you have fairly safe drinking water and are only looking to improve taste, this will get the job done. But if you also want protection against toxic contaminants, this isn't the setup for you.

brita metro - removing chlorine and improving taste are two of the main benefits...
Removing chlorine and improving taste are two of the main benefits you'll get from the Brita Metro.   Credit: Matt Lighthart

What Other Water Filters Should You Consider?


The Amazon Basics 10-cup Pitcher offers much better contaminant removal and costs less overall. Seems like a no-brainer to us. Or if you can spend a little more, the PUR PLUS 11-Cup Pitcher offers the best protection against health-related contaminants, and even comes in a smaller 7-cup version for space-limited households.

There's also the option to replace the Metro's Original filter with a higher quality Elite filter. The Elite filter promises better contaminant removal; however, we're skeptical how much it'll help. The Original filters always performed worse in the Metro than the larger 10-Cup Pitcher. We think the filters may not fit as tightly in the Metro, which allows some impurities to leak through.

Side-by-Side Comparison
Compare Brita Metro versus top competing products:
 
Awards  
Price $26 List
Check Price at Amazon
Overall Score Sort Icon
44
Star Rating
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Bottom Line A cheap, mini-size pitcher for improved taste, but misses the mark with health-related contaminants
Pros Affordable, improves taste, compact size, filter alert
Cons Not great for health concerns, frequent refills, no spout cover
Rating Categories Brita Metro
Lead & Metals (25%)
5.7
Forever Chemicals (PFAS) (20%)
2.0
Microplastics (15%)
3.0
Fluoride & Nitrates (15%)
3.3
Taste & Chlorine (15%)
6.6
Daily Use & Upkeep Cost (10%)
5.9
Specifications Brita Metro
Filter Type Pitcher
Installation Difficulty Low
Estimated cost per year (40 gal/month) $60
Estimated cost per year (160 gal/month) $240
Wastewater Generated No
Filter Replacement Schedule 40 gallons (approx 2 months)
Filter Replacement Cost 1 pack - $8
6 pack - $30
Certifications WQA certified against NSF Standards 42 and 53
Or, compare up to 5 products side-by-side here.
Austin Palmer, Lissette Velasquez