Our Verdict
Compare to Similar Products
![]() This Product
Plustek ePhoto Z300 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Awards | Best Wireless Portable Scanner | Best Budget Portable Scanner | Best Budget Flatbed for Books & Photos | ||
| Price | $230 List Check Price at Amazon | $200 List Check Price at Amazon | $135 List Check Price at Amazon | $130 List Check Amazon (on sale!) | $76 List Check Price at Amazon |
Overall Score ![]() |
|||||
| Star Rating | |||||
| Bottom Line | This model's sluggish scanning and subpar overall performance placed it far behind most of the scanners we've tested | Great performance from a portable scanner that isn't too bad on the wallet | While not the fastest, it excels in every aspect at a relatively low price | Great performance for infrequent tasks, but not great for large tasks that require auto feeding and higher speeds | This flatbed scanner is ideal for archival-quality photos and the occasional simple document, but impractical for everyday home office use |
| Rating Categories | Plustek ePhoto Z300 | Epson WorkForce ES-60W | Brother DS-640 | Epson Perfection V39 II | Canon CanoScan LiDE 300 |
| Scan Quality (35%) | |||||
| Speed (35%) | |||||
| File Management (20%) | |||||
| Photo Scanning (10%) | |||||
| Specifications | Plustek ePhoto Z300 | Epson WorkForce ES-60W | Brother DS-640 | Epson Perfection V39 II | Canon CanoScan LiDE 300 |
| Two-sided Scanning? | No | No | No | No | No |
| Automatic Document Feeder capacity | No | No | No | No | No |
| Measured Pages Per Minute | 0.6 | 2.2 | 1.4 | 1.8 | 0.7 |
| Connectivity | USB | USB, Wifi | Micro USB | USB | USB |
| Multi-feed Detection | No | No | No | No | No |
| Power Source | AC | USB / Battery | USB | USB | USB |
| Paper Sizes | Max: 8.5" x 11.7" Min: 1" x 1" |
Max: 8.5" x 72" / Min: 2" x 2" | Max: 8.5" x 72" Min: 2" x 3.4" |
8.5" x 11.7" | 8.5" x 11.7" |
| Optical Resolution | 600 DPI | 600 DPI | 600 DPI | 4800 DPI | 2400 DPI |
| Suggested Daily Volume | not specified | 300 scans | 100 scans | not specified | not specified |
| Scanner Type | Sheet-fed | Sheet-fed | Sheet-fed | Flatbed | Flatbed |
Our Analysis and Test Results
Scan Quality
The Plustek ePhoto Z300 proved to be a below-average performer in our text scan quality tests. When scanning black and white documents and receipts, I found the text quality to be sharp enough, with just a little blurring when zoomed in, although all dark colors were significantly lightened in the scanning process. Still, the results were legible and usable.
Scan Speed
Speed matters if you value your time, and a faster scanner will handle tasks more quickly, allowing you to move on to more important things than feeding the documents through. Unfortunately, the Plustek ePhoto Z300 is a very slow scanner. Slow scanning speeds and the lack of automatic double-sided scanning (duplex) will leave you feeding large jobs, one page or photo at a time.
In our single-page test, each scanner is tasked with scanning a single sheet double-sided document at the 600 DPI color setting, using the duplex setting when available. The lack of a duplex feature on the Plustek ePhoto Z300 forced us to manually feed the document, resulting in a process that took 92 seconds. By comparison, the fastest scanners completed the task in as little as 7 seconds.
In our 10-page black-and-white document tests, the Plustek ePhoto Z300 completed the task in 455 seconds, and again, the process required manual feeding. For manual duplex scanning, which required feeding each document through twice, a 10-page process took us 930 seconds total. At an average of less than one page per minute, the Plustek is not a fast scanner. In fact, it's painfully slow. I wouldn't even consider it adequate for small tasks if you care about productivity and time.
File Management
Perfect optical character recognition (OCR) simply doesn't exist yet, and while some above-average models we've tested have come exceptionally close, the Plustek ePhoto Z300 is more of an average model.
Optical character recognition turns printed documents and even handwritten ones into digitized documents and is an incredibly useful tool. OCR is on by default on the Plustek and it does a decent job of recognition with a low error rate. It accurately digitized words, only missing a couple in our test, but occasionally combined words.
We rated the user-friendliness of each scanner, specifically evaluating the setup and user interface, and the Plustek proved to be about average. Setup on a PC is performed via a CD, although a tutorial exists if you are a PC user and don't have an optical drive. Mac users are able to download drivers and software via the manufacturer's website. The user interface is non-existent. It lacks a screen, settings, or buttons. While not very robust, it does make the scanning process simple — you simply feed a photo or document one at a time.
Photo Scanning
In our photo scanning quality tests, the Plustek maintained poor color accuracy, adding a tint of blue, and consistently produced scans with a notable increase in graininess. Between text documents, receipts, and photos, this model failed to impress our team, and its quality trailed most average scanners we've tested.
Should You Buy the Plustek ePhoto Z300?
Slow speeds and lower-quality scans compared to its peers left our team wanting a lot more from the Plustek ePhoto Z300. Because of that, we can't recommend this model when there are so many other great options that offer better performance at a similar price point.
What Other Scanners Should You Consider?
The Plustek ePhoto Z300 is one of the weaker-performing scanners that we've tested. While it had a lot of promise, based on extensive product comparisons and reviews, it simply did not perform at a level we had expected. For a portable device capable of taking on the go, check out the Epson WorkForce ES-60W. Not only is it portable, but it outperforms the Plustek and is twenty bucks cheaper. Of course, if you're seeking the best scanning performance and aren't encumbered by budget, then look no further than the Epson FastFoto FF-680W. It offers exceptional performance and is fast enough to make quick work of any scanning tasks.
—Benjamin Hickok











