Reviews You Can Rely On

Plustek ePhoto Z300 Review

Slow scanning and below-average overall quality make this model easy to pass on
gearlab tested logo
Plustek ePhoto Z300 Review (This is a simple, no-frills, scanner without an automatic duplex feature or feed tray, and only offers average...)
This is a simple, no-frills, scanner without an automatic duplex feature or feed tray, and only offers average performance.
Credit: Abriah Wofford
Price:  $230 List
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Manufacturer:   Plustek
Benjamin Hickok
By Benjamin Hickok ⋅ Review Editor  ⋅  May 23, 2023
47
OVERALL
SCORE


RANKED
#14 of 14
  • Scan Quality - 35% 5.3
  • Speed - 35% 3.0
  • File Management - 20% 7.0
  • Photo Scanning - 10% 4.0
List Price: $230

Our Verdict

The Plustek ePhoto Z300 demonstrated below-average performance overall. When scanning black-and-white documents and receipts, I observed reasonably sharp text quality with minimal blurring when zoomed in. However, the scanning process noticeably lightened all black colors, and all scanning processes are painfully slow compared to the average models on the market. Nevertheless, the resulting scans from the Plustek are legible and usable.

Compare to Similar Products

 
plustek ephoto z300
Awards  Top Pick Award
Best Wireless Portable Scanner
Best Buy Award
Best Budget Portable Scanner
 Best Buy Award
Best Budget Flatbed for Books & Photos
Price $230 List
Check Price at Amazon
$200 List
Check Price at Amazon
$135 List
Check Price at Amazon
$130 List
Check Amazon (on sale!)
$76 List
Check Price at Amazon
Overall Score Sort Icon
47
78
74
74
49
Star Rating
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Bottom Line This model's sluggish scanning and subpar overall performance placed it far behind most of the scanners we've testedGreat performance from a portable scanner that isn't too bad on the walletWhile not the fastest, it excels in every aspect at a relatively low priceGreat performance for infrequent tasks, but not great for large tasks that require auto feeding and higher speedsThis flatbed scanner is ideal for archival-quality photos and the occasional simple document, but impractical for everyday home office use
Rating Categories  Plustek ePhoto Z300 Epson WorkForce ES-60W Brother DS-640 Epson Perfection V39 II Canon CanoScan LiDE 300
Scan Quality (35%)
5.3
7.3
7.3
6.7
5.5
Speed (35%)
3.0
7.9
7.0
7.7
3.4
File Management (20%)
7.0
9.0
8.0
8.5
4.3
Photo Scanning (10%)
4.0
7.0
8.0
6.5
9.0
Specifications Plustek ePhoto Z300 Epson WorkForce ES-60W Brother DS-640 Epson Perfection V39 II Canon CanoScan LiDE 300
Two-sided Scanning? No No No No No
Automatic Document Feeder capacity  No No No No No
Measured Pages Per Minute 0.6 2.2 1.4 1.8 0.7
Connectivity USB USB, Wifi Micro USB USB USB
Multi-feed Detection No No No No No
Power Source AC USB / Battery USB USB USB
Paper Sizes Max: 8.5" x 11.7"
Min: 1" x 1"
Max: 8.5" x 72" / Min: 2" x 2" Max: 8.5" x 72"
Min: 2" x 3.4"
8.5" x 11.7" 8.5" x 11.7"
Optical Resolution  600 DPI 600 DPI 600 DPI 4800 DPI 2400 DPI
Suggested Daily Volume not specified 300 scans 100 scans not specified not specified
Scanner Type Sheet-fed Sheet-fed Sheet-fed Flatbed Flatbed

Our Analysis and Test Results

The simplest scans are rather slow with the Plustek ePhoto Z300.   Credit: Abriah Wofford

Scan Quality


The Plustek ePhoto Z300 proved to be a below-average performer in our text scan quality tests. When scanning black and white documents and receipts, I found the text quality to be sharp enough, with just a little blurring when zoomed in, although all dark colors were significantly lightened in the scanning process. Still, the results were legible and usable.

Scan Speed


Speed matters if you value your time, and a faster scanner will handle tasks more quickly, allowing you to move on to more important things than feeding the documents through. Unfortunately, the Plustek ePhoto Z300 is a very slow scanner. Slow scanning speeds and the lack of automatic double-sided scanning (duplex) will leave you feeding large jobs, one page or photo at a time.

In our single-page test, each scanner is tasked with scanning a single sheet double-sided document at the 600 DPI color setting, using the duplex setting when available. The lack of a duplex feature on the Plustek ePhoto Z300 forced us to manually feed the document, resulting in a process that took 92 seconds. By comparison, the fastest scanners completed the task in as little as 7 seconds.

In our 10-page black-and-white document tests, the Plustek ePhoto Z300 completed the task in 455 seconds, and again, the process required manual feeding. For manual duplex scanning, which required feeding each document through twice, a 10-page process took us 930 seconds total. At an average of less than one page per minute, the Plustek is not a fast scanner. In fact, it's painfully slow. I wouldn't even consider it adequate for small tasks if you care about productivity and time.

plustek ephoto z300 - this model is slow, and manual feeding makes every task take even...
This model is slow, and manual feeding makes every task take even more time.   Credit: Abriah Wofford

File Management


Perfect optical character recognition (OCR) simply doesn't exist yet, and while some above-average models we've tested have come exceptionally close, the Plustek ePhoto Z300 is more of an average model.

Optical character recognition turns printed documents and even handwritten ones into digitized documents and is an incredibly useful tool. OCR is on by default on the Plustek and it does a decent job of recognition with a low error rate. It accurately digitized words, only missing a couple in our test, but occasionally combined words.

plustek ephoto z300 - while ocr is good on this model, the software could be better overall.
While OCR is good on this model, the software could be better overall.   Credit: Abriah Wofford

We rated the user-friendliness of each scanner, specifically evaluating the setup and user interface, and the Plustek proved to be about average. Setup on a PC is performed via a CD, although a tutorial exists if you are a PC user and don't have an optical drive. Mac users are able to download drivers and software via the manufacturer's website. The user interface is non-existent. It lacks a screen, settings, or buttons. While not very robust, it does make the scanning process simple — you simply feed a photo or document one at a time.

plustek ephoto z300 - setup on this model is done via a cd for pc users, and could be...
Setup on this model is done via a CD for PC users, and could be problematic for some.   Credit: Abriah Wofford

Photo Scanning


In our photo scanning quality tests, the Plustek maintained poor color accuracy, adding a tint of blue, and consistently produced scans with a notable increase in graininess. Between text documents, receipts, and photos, this model failed to impress our team, and its quality trailed most average scanners we've tested.

The simple and common task of scanning receipts can prove difficult for some models.   Credit: Abriah Wofford

Should You Buy the Plustek ePhoto Z300?


Slow speeds and lower-quality scans compared to its peers left our team wanting a lot more from the Plustek ePhoto Z300. Because of that, we can't recommend this model when there are so many other great options that offer better performance at a similar price point.

What Other Scanners Should You Consider?


The Plustek ePhoto Z300 is one of the weaker-performing scanners that we've tested. While it had a lot of promise, based on extensive product comparisons and reviews, it simply did not perform at a level we had expected. For a portable device capable of taking on the go, check out the Epson WorkForce ES-60W. Not only is it portable, but it outperforms the Plustek and is twenty bucks cheaper. Of course, if you're seeking the best scanning performance and aren't encumbered by budget, then look no further than the Epson FastFoto FF-680W. It offers exceptional performance and is fast enough to make quick work of any scanning tasks.

—Benjamin Hickok