The Maxshot V1 delivers more speed, range, and portability for less money. It goes 5MPH faster, 14 miles further, and weighs 15 pounds less.
The Razor E Prime III is much better than the E300. However, it still can not compare with the Maxshot. See how all these models compare in our electric scooter review. This Product Razor E300 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Awards |  Best Bang for The Buck | ||||
| Price | $360 List $322.79 at Amazon | $500 List | Check Price at Amazon | $299 List | $280 List $179.99 at Amazon |
Overall Score  |
|||||
| Star Rating | |||||
| Bottom Line | Despite the modest price, this scooter's performance — or lack thereof — in our testing regimen left reviewers with little positive to relay | A standard-performing scooter at a decent price | A good performing scooter that rides best in flat landscapes | This budget scooter is a favorite due to its impressive top speed, range, and portability | Inexpensive, but we recommend other models with better range and speed |
| Rating Categories | Razor E300 | Segway E2 Pro | Hiboy S2 Pro | Maxshot V1 | Volpam Q1 |
| Range (30%) | |||||
| Speed and Hills (30%) | |||||
| Ride Comfort (20%) | |||||
| Portability (20%) | |||||
| Specifications | Razor E300 | Segway E2 Pro | Hiboy S2 Pro | Maxshot V1 | Volpam Q1 |
| Measured Maximum Speed | 12.0 mph | 15.7 mph | 17.3 mph | 17.5 mph | 18.1 mph |
| Measured Effective Range | 4.7 miles | 17.2 miles | 17.1 miles | 18.2 miles | 8.0 miles |
| Measured Weight | 42.5 lb | 42.1 lb | 38.1 lb | 27.5 lb | 24.7 lb |
| Motor Size | 250W | 350W | 500W | 350W | 350W |
| Peak Power | 250W | 750W | 700W | 500W | 500W |
| Max Load | 220 lbs | 265 lb | 220 lb | 264 lb | 264 lb |
| Battery Size | 168Wh | 275Wh | 417Wh | 375Wh | 187.2Wh |
| Tire Size | 9" | 10" | 10" | 8.5" | 8.5" |
| Brake Type | Rear disc | Front drum brake with a rear electronic brake | Electronic front brake with rear disc brake | Drum braking and eABS regenerative anti-lock braking | Rear drum braking and eABS |
| Tire Type | Pneumatic | Pneumatic tubeless air-leakage-proof | Solid (honeycomb) | Solid (honeycomb) | Solid (honeycomb) |
| Measured Charge Time | 6.3 hours | 4.5 hours | 7.7 hours | 4.2 hours | 4.4 hours |
| App | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
This electric scooter has several unique features. First, it uses a sealed lead acid battery, which is interesting considering that lithium-ion batteries have become the standard. The E300 also uses a chain-driven motor to transfer power to the rear wheel, meaning there is no electronic hub brake. Finally, the frame and fork are constructed of steel. Given the design and the target consumer (primarily children), it's no wonder this product failed to meet the standards set by the other scooters reviewed here. It also didn't help that our E300 broke during testing and had to be returned.
This metric measures hill-climbing ability and maximum speed in the flats. To assess the prior, we picked two hills (3.5% and 10.5% grade) and ran the scooter up them - if they could. On the shallower of the two, the E300's max speed was reduced by 5-7 mph. However, one tester noted that he was skeptical that the scooter would have continued were the hill any longer. The steeper grade was not attempted for fear of breaking the product before further tests could be completed. (note: the E300 eventually did break during testing).
To assess speed we took the Razor out with a fully charged battery and cranked the throttle taking it to its maximum cruising speed and timed how long it took to go 100 feet. This trial was run three times, and the results were average. At 11.95 mph, the E300 is at the bottom of the class.
This metric assesses our testers' awareness of rough road surfaces and unexpected cracks. This was one of the categories in which the E300 excelled, mainly due to its 9" pneumatic tires.
To grasp a scooter's braking power, we looked at two critical conditions: hill braking and flat ground stopping. The first evaluates the machine's ability to regulate speed when descending a steep hill. The second evaluates the stopping distance on flat ground. Despite having only one (disc) brake, the Razor did quite well in both tests. However, the lack of redundancy in the brake system raises safety concerns.
The range metric is an evaluation of travel radius and battery charging time. When we started testing for range, we quickly realized that we needed to subdivide the travel radius into two parts to describe the performance of the scooters being tested accurately. The first part is the effective range, the number of miles traversed at full speed on flat ground. The second part is the maximum range, the distance the scooter will go at any speed. Here, the E300 shows the problematic nature of its sealed lead acid battery. There is a big gap between the maximum miles (5.9) and the effective miles (4.7) delivered on a charge, and both were well below those delivered by the lithium-ion counterparts. Additionally, the battery was slow to charge, taking about 6 ½ hours. The manufacturer notes in the manual that it can take up to 24 hours to fully charge.
The Razorlacks a folding mechanism for the steering column; its heavy steel frame construction and generally bulky design suggest that its designers did not consider portability. As such, the scooter received the lowest marks in the class in this category.
Given the general lack of performance delivered and the fact that our E300 broke within a few days of purchase, we can not say this product is of good value.
We would recommend that a potential consumer look elsewhere for an electric scooter. Even if you're looking to pick up one of these machines for the kids to play around on in the driveway, there are better options at the price.
