The 4 Best Dash Cams of 2025

Best Overall Dash Cam

Vantrue N2 Pro Uber Dual

Forward Camera Resolution	1440p
Forward Camera Field of View	170º
Screen Size	1.5"
Event Detection G Sensor	Yes
Cabin Camera	Yes

The Vantrue N2 Pro Uber Dual is one of the best cameras you will find on the market today. It includes just about every option you could look for in a dash cam. The front-facing camera can record in crystal-clear 2.5k resolution with a wide (but not distorted) 170˚ field of view. The secondary cabin-facing camera records in 1080p HD with a 140˚ field of view. If you are a rideshare driver, the secondary camera on the N2 Pro can be an essential tool if you need photo or video proof of rough and rowdy guests, experience any unwanted damage in your vehicle, or can be a way to help you feel safe. The camera also has a microphone to capture any verbal interactions. On top of this great video quality and nearly 310˚ of coverage, the N2 Pro's rear-facing camera has infrared sensors that enable it to capture usable images even in complete darkness.

The main downside to the N2 is the price. It retails for almost double the cost of some other single-camera units we tested that can also produce impressively clear footage. That extra cost is only really worth it if you need the second cab-facing camera. Check out the Miofive 4K if you're shopping with limited funds. The N2 also runs on the bulkier side. Honestly, though, we prefer having one larger unit over other dual-camera devices with separate units connected by a mess of wires. Lastly, this device lacks wireless video sharing, so the camera (or the micro SD card) must be plugged into a computer to download its video. Gripes aside, we think this is the best dash cam for rideshare drivers or anyone who wants a cab-facing camera with high-quality video capture.

Read more: Vantrue N2 Pro Uber Dual Review

Best Bang for the Buck

Miofive 4K

Forward Camera Resolution	2160p
Forward Camera Field of View	140º
Screen Size	2.2"
Event Detection G Sensor	Yes
Cabin Camera	No

The Miofive 4K offers crisp 4K resolution with a 140-degree field of view. We love the intuitive interface and the 2.2-inch screen, and it starts recording when you start your car. It has some cool features like GPS and can even create time-lapse videos of your drives. An integrated G-Sensor has the ability to detect collisions or sudden stops and then locks the recorded clip. There is also a mobile app that aids in easy viewing or downloading of your footage.

Unfortunately, this device only offers one forward-facing camera. If you need a cabin camera, check out the Vantrue N2 Pro Uber Dual. The Miofive 4K is also a bit large on the dash, and it doesn't offer the best nighttime video quality compared to other options we tested. Still, given the price, this is a great dash cam offering sharp daytime video quality.

Read more: Miofive 4K Review

Documents Inside and Out

Garmin Tandem

Forward Camera Resolution	1440p
Forward Camera Field of View	180º
Screen Size	N/A
Event Detection G Sensor	Yes
Cabin Camera	Yes

With its dual, or tandem, cameras, the Garmin Tandem offers visibility outside and inside your vehicle. Both cameras offer a whopping 180° field of view, with little to no distortion. This level of visibility on a cab-facing camera is a rare feature that ensures you'll catch everything you may need. The camera's quality is no joke, either. The exterior cam offers 1440p vision during the day and 720p in the dark, and the interior camera offers 720p vision across the board. The voice commands and app make this dash cam easy to use, and the slim body leaves your driving view unobstructed, which is something that most bulky dual-cammed devices do not offer.

We found the app and voice commands very user-friendly in our tests, but the interface on the device itself is quite minimal and less intuitive. The device is also devoid of a screen. Those who prefer a better user interface and a screen to go with it should consider the user-friendly Nextbase 622GW. Since the Tandem is so small, a screen would be somewhat useless anyway, but it is a feature worth noting, especially for its higher price tag. These issues will only burden the user if they do not have a smartphone or would prefer not to use the app. Overall, the Tandem is a great option for anyone who needs to record inside and outside their vehicle.

Read more: Garmin Dash Cam Tandem Review

High Performance with the Price to Match

Nextbase 622GW 4K

Field of View: 140˚ | Resolution: 4K

The Nextbase 622GW 4K comes equipped with a massive screen when compared to the average dash cam. This three-inch LCD touchscreen is accurate and easy to see. The 622GW offers a number of safety features like parking mode, SOS services, and Alexa support, all easily navigated by a clearly labeled and intuitive menu. The video quality and reliability are great, ensuring you don't miss a beat.

After all our testing, our biggest complaint with the Nextbase 622GW is the cost. There is no denying this is a high-performing dash cam, but other contenders in our review almost match its performance for a fraction of the price. So, if you're shopping on a tighter budget, check out the Miofive 4K. If you are searching for an intuitive dash cam with a large touch screen and can afford to splurge, the 622GW is an option you should explore further.

Read more: Nextbase 622GW 4K Review

Compare Products

Compare select up to 5 products to compare

	Score	Product	Price
	80	Nextbase 622GW 4K	$400
	77	Vantrue N2 Pro Uber Dual Best Overall Dash Cam	$200
	72	Miofive 4K Best Bang for the Buck	$130
	72	Garmin 57	$230
	65	Rove R2-4K	$120
	65	Vantrue N4	$260
	63	Garmin Tandem Documents Inside and Out	$300
	63	Rexing V2 Pro AI	$290
	62	Thinkware X1000	$390
	51	Garmin Mini 2	$130

How We Tested

In completing this review, we captured more than 50 hours of footage, driving more than 500 miles, day and night. We became familiar with the installation process of each camera in multiple cars and carefully noted the impact each product setup has on peripheral vision. Once we got a feel for how to operate each camera, we then offloaded all the video, using both memory cards and each camera's associated app, onto a computer. Next, we compared both day and nighttime footage from each camera side-by-side, paying special attention to things like how each model captured license plate numbers and the impact that travel, speed, and light conditions have on video clarity. Along with video quality, we assessed the loop recording and evaluated the user interface of each model. After analyzing our findings, we tallied our results to determine which ones are best for your dashboard. For more on our testing process, see our full How We Test article for dash cams.

Why You Should Trust Us

This review is brought to you by a talented and thorough testing team. We have tested and reviewed more than 200 smart and video capture devices over the years. Our testers have a very good idea of the features that can make gadgets like these integrate well into your daily life and the kinds of drawbacks that may make them more trouble than they're worth.

In her tenure with GearLab, Michelle Powell has designed and implemented testing for hundreds of products, including dozens of audio, video, and security-related items. Whether you simply want to document a beautiful drive or need a camera to accurately record incident information, she has you in mind. Becca Glades is a software developer and well-versed in tinkering with gadgets of all kinds. Through this, she brings her analytical skills and technical knowledge to the table. Hayley Thomas makes up the final part of this stellar testing team. She lives in her converted Sprinter van and travels wherever her wheels will take her, exploring windy mountain roads, busy cities, and long stretches of the wide-open country. Considering her home is also her vehicle, she must take every safety precaution she can, helping to bring this review a true user perspective.

Analysis and Test Results

Most dash cams have similar levels of functionality and performance, so you'll likely choose one based on a specific feature or price point. We designed our tests to identify and amplify those small differences. After spending over 100 hours driving and sorting through the resulting footage, we graded each camera on its video quality, reliability, convenience in capturing and offloading video, interface design, and how much space the units take up on a windshield.

What's the Best Value?

Dash cameras differ in price mainly as a function of how many features any given model has. The Vantrue N2 Pro Uber Dual is reasonably priced and has some of the best features, like a cabin-facing camera and infrared night vision. If you're looking to spend as little as possible, the Miofive 4K will satisfy most people's needs for an approachable price.

Video Quality

We compared the footage from each of the cameras we tested to determine which models rose to the top. Every camera provided visible footage, though some offered a bit more clarity and quality. An area where video quality differs is in low-light situations. We analyzed all of the videos from both a practical perspective (e.g., the ability to read license plates) and a recreational perspective (e.g., sharing scenery on social media). We conducted all of these tests in various daytime lighting conditions and at night to cover the full range of potential driving scenarios.

The best performer in our video testing was the Vantrue N2 Pro Uber Dual. Its 2.5K resolution produces very crisp footage, and the wide 170° field of view covers a lot of area without making the video look distorted. In daylight footage, we had no problem with reading license plate numbers, even in swift-moving traffic. This model is also one of the only cameras on the market with infrared sensors (on the cab-facing camera only), resulting in usable images even in the complete dark. However, it is worth noting that the video quality is slightly lower on the cab-facing cam, and it has a narrower field of view than the front-facing camera. Occasionally at night, we had a bit of trouble making out license plates on moving cars, which was the only reason this model missed out on a perfect score.

A handful of other models fell just behind the Vantrue N2 Pro in our video quality tests. All of these cameras produce clear, crisp video with reasonable color accuracy. However, some had performances worth mentioning. The Miofive 4K has an astonishing 4K resolution with 140° field of view. During the day, it had clear video quality, and we had no trouble reading license plates. However, at night, we had more trouble making out those characters as headlights can wash out the video.

The Rove R2-4K offers a whopping 2160p resolution and a generous 150° field of view. It scored highly in this category with clear daytime video quality, but we found that the Rove does not do well in high-contrast scenarios.

The Tandem field of view comes in at an impressive 180°. We were pleasantly surprised with the lack of distortion we experienced on such a wide angle. The cab-facing camera on the Tandem is of lower quality at 720p, and the external-facing camera drops down to the same resolution in the dark. Still, overall we were very impressed with the Tandem's image quality.

The Garmin 57 boasts 1440 pixel resolution and a 180-degree field of view, but the lens flare at night makes reading license plates extremely difficult. The Nextbase 622GW has a similar issue but performs a little better at night than the Garmin 57. Both work okay during the day with vibrant colors and a mostly clear image.

The Thinkware X1000 is a dual camera system with 156° field of view in both front and back. The daytime video quality is particularly impressive, with no graininess and excellent viewing of license plates. Unfortunately, we can't say as much about its nighttime quality. We couldn't make out any license plates due to graininess and glare.

Video Capture

All dash cams capture video using a technique called loop recording, where many video clips of a specified length get saved to a memory card (in this case, a micro SD card). When the memory card fills up, the oldest clips get deleted to make way for the new ones. If a dash cam's G-sensor senses an incident (like a car accident), it will protect the current clip from being deleted until you physically delete it, ensuring the most important footage is not lost. All dash cams in our review come with a feature that automatically starts recording when the car is started, and evidence that its G-sensor is effective. Beyond that, we assessed the loop recording options offered by each camera. Shorter loop recording clips, say one minute, prevent the memory card from filling up with clips from every time you brake hard, but it also increases the likelihood that an event could occur towards the very end of a clip, with most of the action occurring in the next, unprotected clip. Longer clips take up much more space but are protected against this possibility. Finally, we assessed footage management in this metric, giving higher scores to models that have built-in WiFi networks that allow you to beam clips directly to your phone instead of removing a memory card and plugging it into a computer.

The Rexing V2 earned top marks in this metric. It has a sensitive G-sensor and records in one, three, and five-minute clips. This three-camera option has collision warnings, lane departure warnings, and a parking monitor. The parking monitor feature turns on the camera automatically when it detects movement, even if the car is parked and off. The internal camera has infrared (IR) night vision and accurately records the cabin in low light.

Also earning high marks in this metric is the Nextbase 622GW. It includes various advanced safety features made possible by built-in WiFi and GPS. Although the WiFi is not particularly unique, the 622GW offers emergency SOS response, intelligent parking mode, and built-in voice control. Most of the devices in our test suite offer Event Detection G Sensor, but not all of them work as well as the Garmin 57. The 57 is triggered by a hard break, ensuring every potential accident is caught on video.

The Vantrue N2 Pro offers loop recording clip settings of one, three, and five minutes. This is more than most cameras provide, but it lacks the 10-minute option that some offer. The unique cab-facing camera also captures audio, which is great for rideshare drivers, as you can record any verbal interactions that might occur with one of your passengers. You will need to disclose that your passenger is being recorded in most states.

Another top performer is the Miofive 4K, which connects through a mobile app and includes GPS location. Though it only records one-minute clips, its G-sensor was sensitive enough to start recording with an abrupt stop. Like most others, this includes WiFi connectivity, which helps free up the Bluetooth bandwidth for your phone.

The Rove R2-4K earns a notable mention in our video capture category because of the built-in WiFi, 3-minute clips, and constant video saving. Unlike most of the other models in our test suit, the Rove does not require a verbal command, clicking of any buttons, or a hard stop or crash that triggers a G-force sensor to save footage. It is saving everything that happens in three-minute clips all the time. Once the storage is full, it simply deletes the oldest clip to make room for the newest one. This gives it a huge leg up in recording liability.

The Vantrue 4 is another option worth mentioning. It has WiFi, auto-on, and Event Detection G Sensor. There are one, three, and five-minute clip lengths and and it comes equipped with an interior camera.

The Garmin Tandem is another model with built-in WiFi, which makes it easy to offload footage. The fixed, one-minute loop recording clip length can go both ways. This relatively short amount of time is fine if you're looking to be economical with the space on your memory card, but some people may want a slightly longer clip. That being said, if the Tandem senses an accident it will save the clip in which the impact was detected, as well as the minute before and the minute after. This ensures that you will more than likely catch the entire accident on camera. The Tandem also offers audio recording in the cab, which is great for rideshare drivers.

Interface

Many of the dash cams in our lineup have a small LCD screen that lets you see what the camera is seeing and displays settings menus and some controls to navigate those menus. This interface allows you to position the camera correctly, select specific video capture settings, and review and manage the camera's footage.

In our testing, we used the LCD screen to position and reposition the cameras in multiple cars, and extensively used each control panel to change settings and manage footage. For those that do not have an on-camera view screen, we simply used the associated smartphone app. We were able to get a very good feel for the annoyances and benefits inherent in each camera's interface after choosing every setting possible and sorting through over a hundred hours of video.

The Nextbase 622GW stands out from the crowd with its three-inch LCD touch screen. The large screen makes the image easier to see and the menu easier to navigate. The touch screen is accurate and responsive, the buttons are labeled distinctly, and the menu is very intuitive. The visual quality is also crisp and clear. Updating the software and sharing imagery is made easy with built-in WiFi.

With a large 3.5-inch touchscreen, the Thinkware was particularly easy to use. The main menu has options for volume control, brightness, microphone settings, a parking list, and a file list. Here you can find the video gallery. The Thinkware also has quick access settings, which are easy to spot and convenient. Additionally, the device has large and well-labeled buttons, making this camera that much more user-friendly.

The Garmin 57 is not too far behind. All Garmin devices offer voice commands, which help with user-friendliness and making your driving experience safer. The 57 has a small two-inch screen equipped with decent menus. The prompt before operating is mildly annoying but clears itself after a moment. This device offers safety alerts, but the lane alignment is not always accurate, triggering false alarms while driving. Luckily you can turn this setting off rather easily, which we highly recommend because these alerts can be very distracting. The Tandem and Mini also offer these features, but the tiny screen of the mini and the lack of a screen on the Tandem make things a little less user-friendly for the lower-performing Garmins.

We like, but don't love, the interface of the Vantrue N2 Pro and N4. They provide relatively intuitive menus and reliable controls for navigating those menus. The cameras have more features than almost any other model on the market, which is wonderful, but the teensy 1.5-inch screen on the N2 is our biggest gripe. Navigating all the settings related to those snazzy features on such a small screen had us squinting while sifting through menus. The N4 is way bigger, at 2.5 inches, making it much easier to see.

Visual Footprint

The worst thing one of these cameras can do is encroach on your peripheral vision and create a visual annoyance or, worse, an impediment. These cameras all have different style mounts and may be affixed in different areas of the windshield (for example, some go in the corner while others hide behind the rearview mirror). Thus we evaluated each model's visual footprint subjectively, driving with each on our windshield for dozens of hours in varying conditions and noting how often we noticed the camera in our vision and how distracting it was when that happened.

The Garmin Mini offered the least visually obtrusive profile of all the cameras we tested. We hardly noticed this camera when it was tucked in the corner of the windshield or to the right side of the rearview mirror. Though it doesn't have a built-in screen, its tiny size is hard to beat.

The Garmin 57 and Tandem present slightly larger profiles but are still very compact. These use adhesive mounts that cut down on overall bulkiness compared to suction mounts, although in many applications, the suction mount is better suited. The Garmin 57 is slightly larger than the mini, but its angular shape allows it to hide away quite well.

Outside of the top models, all of the cameras we tested have large enough visual footprints to be easily noticed while driving but aren't so large as to be a constant annoyance. Bottom line, if you're the kind of person that plasters your sunglasses right up to your face because you can't stand seeing the frames in your peripheral vision, you should probably get one of the aforementioned models.

In terms of the visual footprint, we found the Roav A2 and Miofive to be about even. Both are undoubtedly noticeable when installed but present little enough surface area that you shouldn't have a problem ignoring the small spot they occupy in your peripheral vision.

Due to its dual cameras and an array of infrared sensors, the Vantrue N2 Pro sports a pretty hefty visual footprint. Measuring 3.8 x 1.5 inches and utilizing a large suction mount that only adds to its visual weight, this camera will likely be noticeable in your peripheral vision. That said, it is still much smaller than the five-inch square that most government agencies consider the legal maximum, and if placed right below the rearview mirror, it doesn't present too much of a visual annoyance.

Conclusion

Though we certainly wouldn't call dash cams a necessity for all drivers, they can provide some peace of mind for people who often drive on crowded, more accident-prone streets, or for those who offer rideshare services and would like some form of security or accountability for what is happening in their vehicle. We've found that while almost any dash cam can get the job done, specific models offer much better user experiences and video quality than others, and some might have single or dual cameras. We hope that our testing results have helped you find the best way to spend your hard-earned cash.